These are just examples of how the workload could be distributed which was discussed today.
I think that using words like 'leader' and 'dictator' may be funny in some respects, but they also have unhelpful and un-neutral connotations- however it is really important for us to manage this project more efficiently, in a democratic fashion. In order to do that we need to have more meetings with all the student bodies ( or the majority if not all) present. Today was a good example of how this worked in collaberating our ideas- but there was also an overload of information, and not much resolution. it was all a bit vague. i think we need a criteria- of things we need to assess etc.we need a timetable/ with deadlines- if for a lot of us, we want this show to be a 'sucess'.
2 comments:
I think we should orginize a meeting for asap somewhere perhaps OMB lecture theatre as its the easiest way of hearing everyones ideas. To keep it calm/ordered we should nominate a few people, someone making notes others speaking - we could have different people being incharge each time perhaps.
I agree we need to be less vague in time for Xmas. The groups are roughly divided by the loose groups Simon organised but better to do by task choice. Ultimately a list of tasks that is matched one on one to people is the best way forward for now.
ie Deadline: 1 weeks time everybody has to make 5-10 Xmas cards each. (one a day!) Choose a 'buddy' to nag you.
1 weeks time everybody has to make one phone call that might get a sponsor or donation.
Post a Comment